BEIRUT (AFP) — Lebanon entered a decisive week on Monday during
which the parliament is due to elect a new president, with many warning
that the country risks sliding into chaos if the political vacuum
persists.
“We are now in an interim period which may lead us to
stability, or to chaos and confrontation,” Cardinal Nasrallah Sfeir,
from whose Maronite community Lebanese presidents are drawn, said
during his Sunday sermon.
President Emile Lahoud left office at
the end of his term on Friday after parliament failed to elect his
successor amid continued deadlock between the Western-backed government
and the opposition, supported by Syria and Iran.
Although
politicians have vowed to agree on a consensus candidate by the time
MPs convene again for a vote on Friday, there has been no tangible
progress.
“Everybody — especially those responsible for
brokering an agreement — is asked to show seriousness and honest
patriotism,” the cardinal said.
The government, considered
illegitimate by the opposition since its six ministers quit last
November, said on Saturday that it was taking charge of running Lebanon
in line with the constitution.
But the opposition, spearheaded by
Shiite militant group Hezbollah which fought last year’s war with
Israel, contested the government’s interpretation of its constitutional
authority.
Lebanon is now “without an executive power,” Hezbollah number two Naim Qassem said.
Prime Minister Fuad Siniora’s government “does not exist, cannot rule and cannot take over from the presidency,” he said.
The
deadlock is widely seen as an extension of the confrontation between
the two sides’ foreign sponsors — the United States and its key Arab
ally Saudi Arabia for the government, and Iran and its key Arab ally
Syria for the opposition.
“The problem can be fixed in one day or
in one month, as Lebanon has again become the victim of regional
tensions,” political analyst and law professor Sami Salhab told AFP.
“Lebanon is again a mail box where every foreign player sends a message to other players.”
Attention
focussed on Tuesday’s Middle East peace meeting in the United States
following Syria’s 11th-hour decision to attend over the opposition of
its ally Iran.
The An-Nahar daily said all negotiations between
the government and the opposition were effectively frozen until after
the meeting in Annapolis outside Washington.
“There won’t be any
serious developments before the results of Annapolis are clear,
especially as far as how future relations between Syria and Washington
will evolve,” the newspaper said.
Justice Minister Charles Rizk
told Lebanese radio that by agreeing to attend the conference, Syria
was playing a pivotal role “which constitutes a first step in US
efforts to break the Syrian-Iranian alliance”.
Syria announced on
Sunday that it was sending Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad to
Annapolis following what it said were assurances that the return of the
Israeli-occupied Golan Heights would be on the meeting’s agenda.
Peace
talks between Syria and Israel broke down in 2000 when Israel baulked
at Syrian demands for the return of the entire territory, right down to
the shores of the Sea of Galilee, its main water source.
Political
analyst Michael Young said developments between the two sides at the
peace meeting would have a major bearing on the outcome of Lebanon’s
political crisis.
“We have to watch progress on the Syrian track in Annapolis,” he said.
“Either
the Syrian track makes progress, and the United States will demand
concessions from Syria, or the Syrian track does not make progress and
Syria becomes more isolated.
“In either case, Syria will have to make concessions in Lebanon.”
Source: AFP